Study register · detail
No benefit demonstrated
GRADE
Low
4 citations
Samplen = 53 Pat.
Duration6 weeks double-blind phase…
ControlPlacebo
EndpointModified Ashworth Scale
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidvollspektrum
THC:CBD10:1
Routeoral
Key finding
No significant differences in spasticity, motor function and quality of life between FSCO and placebo; increased drowsiness in the FSCO group.
Summary
Double-blind RCT in n=53 children/adolescents (5-25 years) with spastic cerebral palsy GMFCS IV-V, Full-Spectrum Cannabis Oil (CBD:THC 10:1) vs. placebo over 6 weeks (followed by 6-week open-label phase); NO significant difference in spasticity (modified Ashworth Scale), motor function (GMFM-88) or quality of life between FSCO and placebo groups; significantly more drowsiness in the FSCO group; adverse events mild-moderate, no life-threatening events.
P
PopulationChildren and adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy GMFCS IV–V, age 5–25 years, n=53
I
InterventionFull-Spectrum Cannabis Oil (FSCO), CBD:THC ratio 10:1, oral, 6 weeks double-blind + 6 weeks open-label
C
ControlPlacebo (oral)
O
OutcomeNo significant difference in spasticity (modified Ashworth Scale), motor function or quality of life between FSCO and placebo; FSCO group significantly more drowsy
Confidence in the evidence
Low
The second of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is of limited reliability.
Downgraded for
Risk of biasImprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
Double-blind
Effect size
No benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Background: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of full-spectrum cannabis oil (FSCO) (CBD:THC ratio of 10:1) for the treatment of spasticity in individuals with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) grades IV and V.
Method: A pilot trial to assess the feasibility of FSCO in seven CP patients was followed by a prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel trial, with 53 participants aged 5-25 years, randomised in a 1:1 ratio. The double-blind phase lasted six weeks, followed by the open-label phase of six weeks' duration. The primary endpoint was a change in spasticity measured by the modified Ashworth Scale. Secondary outcomes were changes in motor function (Gross Motor Function Measure 88 scale), quality of life, safety, and tolerability.
Results: There was no significant difference in spasticity, motor function, and quality of life parameters between patients receiving FSCO or placebo. Patients in the FSCO group were significantly drowsier compared to the placebo group. Adverse events were mild to moderate; there were no life-threatening events.
Interpretation: This trial suggests FSCO treatment in children with CP is generally well tolerated and safe. It might have benefits on quality of life. No significant change in spasticity was demonstrated with FSCO treatment compared to the placebo.
The impediment to action advances action.