Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
Moderate
21 citations
Samplek = 45 Studien
n = 37 Pat.
n = 37 Pat.
DurationStudies published before May…
EndpointAssociation RCU–PTSD
Blindingunklar
DesignSystematic Review
Key finding
Majority of studies (n=37 of 45) showed significant association between RCU and PTSD; direction of effects variable and possibly bidirectional.
Summary
Systematic review on recreational cannabis use and PTSD; k=45 studies, of which n=37 with significant association. Findings support both self-medication and high-risk models; association probably bidirectional. Methodological variability (particularly non-standardized cannabis assessments) complicates comparability.
P
PopulationPersons with PTSD and/or recreational cannabis use – pooled study count N=45 studies
I
InterventionRecreational cannabis use (recreational cannabis use)
O
OutcomeMajority of studies (n=37 of 45) showed significant association between recreational cannabis use and PTSD; findings support self-medication and high-risk models, but are bidirectional and methodologically heterogeneous
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate
The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.
Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Background: Given recent changes in the legal status of cannabis, the risks and benefits associated with its use have become an important public health topic. A growing body of research has demonstrated that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and recreational cannabis use (RCU) frequently co-occur, yet findings are inconsistent (e.g., direction of effect) and methodological variability makes comparison across studies difficult.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of all studies (N = 45) published before May 2020 regarding etiologic models of co-occurring RCU and PTSD, as well as provided a methodological critique to inform suggestions for future research initiatives.
Results: Findings indicate that a majority of studies (n = 37) demonstrated a significant association between RCU and PTSD. Findings provide evidence for the self-medication and high-risk models posited to explain co-occurring RCU and PTSD despite variability in assessment of RCU, which includes commonly used non-standardized self-report questions.
Conclusion: The association between RCU and PTSD is likely bidirectional. Results inform clinicians and researchers working in the mental health and cannabis use fields how the variability in findings on the association between RCU and PTSD may be attributable, in part, to methodological issues that permeate the extant literature pertaining to RCU and PTSD.
The impediment to action advances action.