Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
Moderate
54 citations
Samplen = 55 Pat.
Durationunclear
ControlStandard MET-CBT alone, n=28
EndpointCannabis abstinence /…
Blindingunklar
DesignRCT
Key finding
ICART led to a higher abstinence rate post-treatment, but therapy type did not moderate the effect on frequency of use and associated problems.
Summary
Pilot RCT (n=55; 56.4% male, M(age)=23.2 years) on integrated CBT for comorbid cannabis use disorder and anxiety disorders (ICART) vs. MET-CBT alone. ICART patients attended significantly more sessions and showed higher post-treatment abstinence rates. Both treatments reduced cannabis use and problems; no moderator effect of therapy type on frequency of use.
P
PopulationAdults with cannabis use disorder (CUD) and comorbid anxiety disorder, 56,4% male, mean age 23,2 years, 63,3% non-Hispanic white, n=55
I
InterventionIntegrated transdiagnostic anxiety CBT combined with MET-CBT (ICART), n=27
C
ControlStandard MET-CBT alone, n=28
O
OutcomeICART patients attended significantly more therapy sessions and showed higher abstinence rates at end of treatment; no significant moderation effect of therapy type on frequency of use and cannabis-related problems
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate
The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.
Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is the most common illicit substance use disorder and individuals with CUD have high rates of comorbid anxiety disorders. Comorbidity between CUD and anxiety disorders is of public health relevance given that although motivation enhancement therapy (MET) combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious intervention for CUD, outcomes are worse for patients with elevated anxiety. The current study tested the acceptability and efficacy of the integration of a transdiagnostic anxiety CBT (i.e., treatment of patients with any anxiety disorder) with MET-CBT (integrated cannabis and anxiety reduction treatment, or ICART) for CUD compared to MET-CBT alone. Treatment-seeking cannabis users (56.4% male, M(age) = 23.2, 63.3% non-Hispanic White) with CUD and at least one comorbid anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to ICART (n = 27) or MET-CBT (n = 28). Patients in the ICART condition attended significantly more treatment sessions than those in the MET-CBT condition. Patients in the ICART condition were more likely to be abstinent post-treatment than those in MET-CBT. Further, treatment produced decreases in cannabis use and related problems. Notably, therapy type did not moderate the impact of treatment on frequency of use and related problems. Together, these data suggest that ICART may be at least as efficacious as a gold-standard psychosocial CUD treatment, MET-CBT, for a difficult-to-treat subpopulation of cannabis users.
The impediment to action advances action.