Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
High
30 citations
Samplen = 108 Pat.
Duration24 hours after chemotherapy
ControlChlorpromazine 25 mg
EndpointNausea and vomiting
Blindingeinfachblind
DesignRCT (randomisiert, einfach blind, aktive Kontrollgruppe)
Cannabinoidthc
Max. dose3.0 mg
Key finding
Levonantradol 0,5 mg showed better antiemetic effect than chlorpromazine, but is not recommended due to unacceptable CNS side effects.
Summary
n=108 cancer patients undergoing highly emetogenic cytostatic therapy; cannabinoid antiemetic levonantradol 0,5 mg superior to chlorpromazine 25 mg; dysphoric adverse effects in 22% (0,5 mg) and 50% (higher doses); efficacy limited with cisplatin regimens. Clinically relevant antiemetic control at the lowest dose.
P
PopulationPatients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy (first-line cycle) for malignant diseases, n=108
I
InterventionLevonantradol (0,5 mg, 0,75 mg or 1 mg i.m.) as antiemetic, administered 2 h before chemotherapy, then 2 h after and every 4 h for a further 8 h
C
ControlChlorpromazine 25 mg (active control group, same dosing schedule)
O
OutcomeLevonantradol 0,5 mg showed superior antiemetic efficacy vs. chlorpromazine 25 mg; however dysphoric reactions in 22% (0,5 mg) to 50% (higher doses) of patients; no satisfactory result with cisplatin-containing regimens
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
Single-blind
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
One hundred and eight patients selected to receive combinations of highly emetic cytotoxic chemotherapy for malignant disease were included in a study of anti-emetic therapy. The patients were randomly allocated to receive levonantradol (0.5, 0.75 or 1 mg) or chlorpromazine (25 mg) prior to receiving their first course of cytotoxic therapy. The appropriate anti-emetic was administered 2 hr prior to the start of chemotherapy, 2 hr after chemotherapy and subsequently at 4-hourly intervals for a further 8 hr. The extent of anorexia, nausea and vomiting along with other side-effects were assessed at regular intervals by physicians and nursing staff during the 24 hr following chemotherapy. In addition, a self-assessment questionnaire was completed by the patients. Levonantradol (0.5 mg) was superior to chlorpromazine (25 mg) as an anti-emetic. Both were reasonably well tolerated, although at this dose of levonantradol 22% of patients experienced dysphoric reactions. At higher doses of levonantradol the proportion of patients experiencing these reactions rose to 50%, but without a concomitant increase in antiemetic activity. Neither drug achieved satisfactory control of vomiting in patients receiving combinations containing cis-platinum. We conclude that levonantradol (0.5 mg) is a more effective anti-emetic than chlorpromazine (25 mg) in patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, its use cannot be recommended due to its high incidence of unacceptable central nervous system side-effects.
The impediment to action advances action.