Study register · detail
No benefit demonstrated
GRADE
High
6 citations
Samplen = 144 Pat.
Duration28 days
ControlPlacebo oil plus palliative care
EndpointESAS – Total Symptom Distress…
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Routeoral
Key finding
THC:CBD combination oil showed no significant benefit over placebo for overall symptom burden, with only a small pain benefit that was offset by greater psychomimetic toxicity.
Summary
RCT (n=144) on 1:1 THC:CBD oil (10 mg/ml) vs. placebo in advanced cancer over 28 days; primary endpoint Total Symptom Distress Score (TSDS) day 14: no difference between arms (MC -6.30±12.3, placebo -6.98±12.56, p=0.76). ESAS pain score significant for MC (MC -1.42±2.15, placebo -0.46±2.83, p=0.04), but higher psychomimetic toxicity. Global Impression of Change and pain-QoL favoured MC.
P
PopulationAdults with advanced cancer under palliative care, n=144
I
InterventionMedicinal Cannabis oil 1:1 THC:CBD (10 mg/ml per cannabinoid), dose escalation over 14 days, then continuation until day 28
C
ControlPlacebo oil plus palliative care
O
OutcomeNo significant difference in TSDS between MC and placebo at day 14 (−6,30 vs. −6,98; p=0,76); significant pain reduction in the MC arm (ESAS pain −1,42 vs. −0,46; p=0,04) with increased psychomimetic toxicity
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
Double-blind
Effect size
No benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Purpose: Patients with cancer commonly access cannabis hoping to relieve their symptoms. This study assessed whether a 1:1 10 mg/ml THC:CBD combination oil could improve total symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer over that provided by palliative care alone.
Methods: Participants were randomised to medicinal cannabis (MC) or placebo oil; dose escalated over 14 days according to tolerance and efficacy and continued to day 28. Symptoms assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) were summated to give a total symptom distress score (TSDS). The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in TSDS at day 14. Secondary outcomes included individual symptom scores, opioid use, participant-selected dose, QoL, psychological symptoms, global impression of change (GIC), and adverse effects.
Results: The pre-planned sample size of 120 at day 14 was reached following the randomisation of 144 patients. Mean (SD) TSDS improved over time in both arms (- 6.30 (12.3) MC, - 6.98 (12.56) placebo, p = 0.76) to day 14 with no difference between arms. A statistically significant improvement in ESAS pain scores in the MC arm (mean (SD) - 1.42 (2.15) MC and - 0.46 (2.83) placebo, p = 0.04) was at the expense of greater psychomimetic toxicity. Improvement in general well-being was greater for the placebo. GIC and the pain component of QoL both favoured
Mc. Conclusions: Patients can be informed that a 1:1 THC:CBD combination cannabis oil was no better than palliative care alone in palliating symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. A small benefit in pain control was associated with greater toxicity.
Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12619000037101, 14/01/2019.
The impediment to action advances action.