Study register · detail
Clear benefit
GRADE
Moderate
63 citations
Samplen = 30 Pat.
Duration3 months
ControlDelayed cannabis start
EndpointFeasibility
Blindingoffen
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD2:1
Max. dose51.0 mg
Routeoral
Key finding
Higher proportion of early cannabis patients achieved reduction in opioid use and improved pain control; no serious safety issues reported.
Summary
Pilot RCT in n=30 patients with stage IV cancer under opioid therapy, randomized 1:1 to early cannabis (EC) vs. delayed start (DC). Estimated mean daily THC/CBD doses after 3 months: 34 mg THC and 17 mg CBD. Higher proportion of the EC group achieved opioid reduction and improved pain control (numerical values not specified in the abstract). No serious safety issues; high patient satisfaction. Feasibility study for RCTs in state cannabis programs.
P
PopulationAdults with advanced carcinoma (stage IV) under opioid therapy, n=30
I
InterventionMedical cannabis (THC/CBD oral, mean daily dose ~34 mg THC / ~17 mg CBD) via a state program for 3 months, dosage/formulation individualized by pharmacists
C
ControlDelayed cannabis start (standard oncology care without MC for the first 3 months, n=15)
O
OutcomeHigher proportion of patients with opioid reduction and improved pain control in the early cannabis group vs. delayed cannabis group (no exact p-values reported); no serious safety events; high patient satisfaction
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate
The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.
Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
Open-label
Effect size
Clear benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Purpose: The prevalence of medical cannabis (MC) use in patients with cancer is growing, but questions about safety, efficacy, and dosing remain. Conducting randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) using state-sponsored MC programs is novel and could provide data needed to guide patients and providers.
Methods: A pilot RCT of patients with stage IV cancer requiring opioids was conducted. Thirty patients were randomized 1:1 to early cannabis (EC, n = 15) versus delayed start cannabis (DC, n = 15). The EC group obtained 3 months (3 M) of MC through a state program at no charge, while the DC group received standard oncology care without MC for the first 3 M. Patients met with licensed pharmacists at one of two MC dispensaries to determine a suggested MC dosing, formulation, and route. Patients completed surveys on pain levels, opioid/MC use, side effects, and overall satisfaction with the study.
Results: Interest in the study was high as 36% of patients who met eligibility criteria ultimately enrolled. The estimated mean daily THC and CBD allotments at 3 M were 34 mg and 17 mg, respectively. A higher proportion of EC patients achieved a reduction in opioid use and improved pain control. No serious safety issues were reported, and patients reported high satisfaction.
Conclusion: Conducting RCTs using a state cannabis program is feasible. The addition of MC to standard oncology care was well-tolerated and may lead to improved pain control and lower opioid requirements. Conducting larger RCTs with MC in state-sponsored programs may guide oncology providers on how to safely and effectively incorporate MC for interested patients.
The impediment to action advances action.