Study register · detail
Clear benefit
GRADE
Moderate
63 citations
Samplen = 34 Pat.
Duration4 weeks of treatment plus 2…
ControlPlacebo spray
EndpointH/M ratio
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT (cross-over)
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Routeoromukosal
Key finding
Sativex showed significantly more frequent clinical improvement on the Modified Ashworth Scale (50% vs. 23,5%, p=0,041) compared to placebo, confirming the clinical benefit for MS spasticity.
Summary
n=34 progressive MS patients with spasticity (crossover RCT, 4 weeks), Sativex (THC+CBD) vs. placebo; primary endpoint H/M ratio showed no significant group difference; clinical response (modified Ashworth Scale ≥20% improvement) significantly more frequent under Sativex than placebo (50 vs. 23,5%; p=0,041).
P
PopulationAdults with progressive Multiple Sclerosis and spasticity of the lower extremities, n=34 (analysed; 44 recruited)
I
InterventionSativex® (THC+CBD) oromucosal spray, 4 weeks (incl. 2 weeks titration)
C
ControlPlacebo spray
O
OutcomeH/M ratio: no significant difference between treatments; Modified Ashworth Scale: ≥20% improvement significantly more frequent under Sativex vs. placebo (50% vs. 23,5%; p=0,041)
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate
The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.
Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
Double-blind
Effect size
Clear benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Despite the proven efficacy of Sativex® (9-delta-tetrahydrocannabinol plus cannabidiol) oromucosal spray in reducing spasticity symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS), little is known about the neurophysiological correlates of such effects. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of Sativex on neurophysiological measures of spasticity (H/M ratio) and corticospinal excitability in patients with progressive MS. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Consecutive subjects with progressive MS and lower limb spasticity referred to our center were randomized to 4 weeks' treatment (including 2 weeks' titration) with Sativex or placebo, with crossover after a 2-week washout. Clinical and neurophysiological measures (H/M ratio and cortical excitability) of spasticity were assessed. The H/M ratio was the primary outcome, with sample size calculation of 40 patients. Of 44 recruited patients, 34 were analyzed due to 6 drop-outs and 4 exclusions, which lowered the power of the study to show differences between treatments. Neurophysiological measures did not differ significantly according to treatment and did not correlate significantly with clinical response. Response on the modified Ashworth scale (at least 20 % improvement) was significantly more frequent after Sativex than placebo (50 vs 23.5 %; p = 0.041; McNemar). Side effects did not differ significantly according to treatment. Our findings confirm the clinical benefit of Sativex on MS spasticity. The lack of corresponding changes in corticospinal excitability and on the monosynaptic component, of the stretch reflex, although in a limited sample size, points to the involvement of other spinal and supraspinal mechanisms in the physiopathology of spasticity in progressive MS.
The impediment to action advances action.