Study register · detail
Clear benefit
GRADE
Moderate
55 citations
Samplen = 38 Pat.
Durationtwo consecutive chemotherapy…
ControlDomperidone 20 mg oral, same schedule
EndpointNumber of vomiting episodes
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT (randomisiert, doppelblind, aktiv-kontrolliert)
Cannabinoidthc
Max. dose3.0 mg
Routeoral
Key finding
Nabilone significantly reduced the number of vomiting episodes compared to domperidone.
Summary
n=38 cancer patients under highly emetogenic chemotherapy (70% cisplatin); nabilone 1 mg every 8 hours vs. domperidone 20 mg; mean vomiting episodes cycle 1: nabilone 4,76 vs. domperidone 12,95 (p<0,02); cycles 1+2 combined: 4,53 vs. 10,81 (p<0,01); nabilone significantly superior.
P
PopulationPatients with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (70% cisplatin-containing), n=38
I
InterventionNabilone (N) 1 mg oral, night before chemotherapy and every 8 hours on chemotherapy days, two cycles
C
ControlDomperidone (D) 20 mg oral, same schedule
O
OutcomeMean number of vomiting episodes cycle 1: N 4,76 vs. D 12,95 (p<0,02); combined cycles 1+2: N 4,53 vs. D 10,81 (p<0,01)
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate
The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.
Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
Double-blind
Effect size
Clear benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
A prospective randomized double-blind trial comparing the butyrophenone analogue domperidone (D) and the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone (N) in the treatment of cytotoxic-induced emesis was conducted in 38 patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens (70% containing cisplatin). Patients received 20 mg D or 1 mg N the night before chemotherapy and 8-hourly on each chemotherapy day for two consecutive cycles of treatment. Three of 19 patients randomized to N completed only one cycle because of disease progression or subjectively adverse effects. Four of 19 patients completed only one cycle of D because of lack of efficacy or chemotherapy toxicity. In all, 32 cycles of N and 33 cycles of D were evaluable for efficacy. The mean number of vomiting episodes in cycle 1 was 4.76 for N and 12.95 for D (P less than 0.02). The corresponding values for cycle 2 were 4.27 and 7.69 (P greater than 0.10), and for cycles 1 and 2 combined, 4.53 for N and 10.81 for D (P less than 0.01). Nausea and food intake scores did not differ significantly, although there was a trend towards less nausea and an increased food intake with N. Subjectively adverse effects were more frequent with N and included drowsiness, dizziness, dry mouth, and postural hypotension. N is superior to D for the control of cytotoxic-induced emesis.
The impediment to action advances action.