Study register · detail
Clear benefit
GRADE
Moderate
69 citations
Samplen = 36 Pat.
Durationunclear
ControlProchlorperazine 10 mg oral
EndpointAntiemetic response rate
Blindingunklar
DesignRandomized Controlled Trial (crossover)
Cannabinoidthc
Routeoral
Key finding
THC reduced nausea and vomiting in 64% of patients (23/36) compared to 3% under prochlorperazine (1/36).
Summary
Randomised crossover study (n=36) in cancer patients with refractory chemotherapy-induced nausea: oral THC (15 mg/m²) reduced nausea and vomiting in 23/36 (64%) of patients vs. 1/36 (3%) under prochlorperazine. All patients reported transient sensory changes; dysphoria occurred in 17/36 cases. Recommended starting dose 5 mg/m².
P
PopulationCancer patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, refractory to standard antiemetics, n=36
I
InterventionOral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) 15 mg/m²
C
ControlProchlorperazine (PCZ) 10 mg oral
O
OutcomeTHC reduced nausea and vomiting in 23/36 (64%) vs. 1/36 under PCZ
Confidence in the evidence
Moderate
The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.
Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Clear benefit
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 15 mg/m2, was compared to prochlorperazine (PCZ), 10 mg. for the control of cancer chemotherapy-related emesis. Thirty-six patients whose vomiting was refractory to standard antiemetic therapy were entered in this randomized comparative cross-over study. THC decreased nausea and vomiting in 23 of 36 (64%) patients compared to 1 of 36 receiving PCZ. THC efficacy was not dependent on the class of antineoplastic-agent inducing the emetic symptoms, age of patients or type of sensorial change experienced. Using the 15 mg/m2 dose, all patients experienced transient sensorial changes, characterized as a pleasant "high" in 19 or a variable state of dysphoria in 17 cases. This study confirms the usefulness of THC in patients whose chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is refractory to other standard antiemetics. While excellent antiemetic control was achieved at the dosage 15 mg/m2, dysphoria was encountered at this dose level and we recommend that an initial dose of 5 mg/m2 which, if necessary, can be carefully increased to achieve maximum antiemetic benefit.
The impediment to action advances action.