Study register · detail
Mixed
GRADE
High
4 citations
Samplek = 11 Studien
Durationunclear
ControlPlacebo or active control
EndpointGlobal symptom assessment
Blindingunklar
DesignSystematic Review
Key finding
Cannabis whole-plant extract might improve global assessment symptoms, but results for other outcomes are uncertain; very low to low evidence certainty.
Summary
Cochrane-compliant systematic review of cannabis derivatives in autism; k=11 RCTs (of which 4 with available results for children/adolescents). Five different cannabis preparations tested. One trial showed possible improvement in global symptom severity, uncertain findings for other outcomes. No quality-of-life data. Evidence certainty: very low to low (GRADE). Review concludes uncertainty about clinical efficacy.
P
PopulationChildren/adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorder
I
InterventionCannabis derivatives and their analogues (5 different cannabis presentations)
C
ControlPlacebo or active control
O
OutcomeCannabis whole-plant extract might improve overall symptomatology; uncertain results for further outcomes; evidence quality very low to low
Confidence in the evidence
High
The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.
Quality profile
Sample size
★★★★★
Blinding
—
Effect size
Mixed
Citations / year
★★★★★
Authors
Share
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorders are characterized by some difficulties with social interactions and communication, atypical patterns of behavior, and unusual reactions to emotions. Studies have found promising results regarding the effects of cannabis on autism. We conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials on the effects of cannabis derivatives and their analogs for autism. This review was developed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported according to PRISMA 2020. The protocol was prospectively published in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023468300). We included randomized controlled trials with autism-diagnosed participants treated with any cannabis derivate or its analogs for therapeutic purposes. Two reviewers assessed titles and abstracts independently and potentially eligible full texts were assessed to confirm eligibility. After that, they extracted data using a standardized worksheet. Searches retrieved 1264 references, only 11 RCTs were included, four with available results for children/adolescents with autism. Five different cannabis presentations were tested. One trial pointed that cannabis may improve global assessment symptoms, but for other outcomes results were uncertain. No included study assessed quality of life. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low to low certainty for the assessed outcomes. Cannabis whole plant extract may improve global assessment symptoms, but the different cannabis presentations, outcome assessments and very low certainty of evidence from the included studies make it difficult to draw conclusions about cannabis for people with autism. This scenario of uncertainties impacts directly clinical practice and decision making.
The impediment to action advances action.