Neuropathic Pain
Study register · detail RCT · Neuropathic Pain · 2023

Oral capsules of tetra-hydro-cannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD) and their combination in peripheral neuropathic pain treatment.

No benefit demonstrated GRADE High 31 citations
Samplen = 115 Pat.
Duration8-week treatment period
ControlPlacebo capsules
EndpointNRS
Blindingdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Max. dose75.0 mg
Routeoral
Key finding

CBD, THC and their combination showed no significant pain reduction versus placebo in peripheral neuropathic pain.

Summary

n=115 (ITT) peripheral neuropathic pain patients (polyneuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, peripheral nerve injury), randomised to CBD (5–50 mg), THC (2.5–25 mg), CBD/THC combination or placebo over 8 weeks. None of the cannabinoid arms reduced pain vs. placebo (p=0.04–0.60); effect sizes week 8: CBD +1.14 NRS points (95% CI 0.11–2.19), THC +0.38 (-0.65 to 1.4), CBD/THC -0.12 (-1.13 to 0.89).

P
PopulationAdults with peripheral neuropathic pain (painful polyneuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, peripheral nerve injury) who did not tolerate/failed at least one prior evidence-based pharmacotherapy, n=115 (ITT)
I
InterventionOral capsules CBD (5–50 mg/Tag), THC (2,5–25 mg/Tag) or CBD/THC combination (5 mg/2,5 mg–50 mg/25 mg/Tag), flexible dosing over 8 weeks
C
ControlPlacebo capsules (1:1:1:1 randomisation)
O
OutcomeNo significant pain reduction versus placebo for any of the arms; effect sizes week 8: CBD +1,14 NRS points (95% CI 0,11–2,19), THC +0,38 (CI −0,65 to 1,40), CBD/THC −0,12 (CI −1,13 to 0,89), p=0,04–0,60
Confidence in the evidence
High

The highest of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is very reliable.

Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding Double-blind
Effect size No benefit
Citations / year
Authors
Zubcevic K, Petersen M, Bach FW, Heinesen A, Enggaard TP, Almdal TP, Holbech JV, Vase L, Jensen TS, Hansen CS
DOI 10.1002/ejp.2072
Design: RCT
Share
Abstract
Background: Cannabinoids are often prescribed for neuropathic pain, but the evidence-based recommendation is 'weak against'. Objectives: The aim was to examine the effect of two cannabinoids and their combination in peripheral neuropathic pain. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, trial with treatment arms for cannabidiol (CBD), tetra-hydro-cannabinol (THC), CBD and THC combination (CBD/THC), and placebo in a 1:1:1:1 ratio and flexible drug doses (CBD 5-50 mg, THC 2.5-25 mg, and CBD/THC 5 mg/2.5 mg-50 mg/25 mg). Treatment periods of 8-week duration were proceeded by 1 week for baseline observations. Patients with painful polyneuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia and peripheral nerve injury (traumatic or surgical) failing at least one previous evidence-based pharmacological treatment were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was the change in weekly average of daily pain measured with a numeric rating scale (NRS). Trail Making Test (TMT) was used as one of the tests of mental functioning. Results: In all, 145 patients were included in the study of which 118 were randomized and 115 included in the intention-to-treat analysis. None of the treatments reduced pain compared to placebo (p = 0.04-0.60). Effect sizes as estimated in week 8 (positive values worse and negative better than placebo) were CBD mean 1.14 NRS points (95% CI 0.11-2.19), THC 0.38 (CI -0.65 to 1.4) and CBD/THC -0.12 (-1.13 to 0.89). Conclusions: CBD, THC and their combination did not relieve peripheral neuropathic pain in patients failing at least one previous evidence-based treatment for neuropathic pain.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius