Anorexia Nervosa
Study register · detail RCT · Anorexia Nervosa · 2026

Cannabidiol in Anorexia Nervosa: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo Controlled Pilot Study to Test Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Symptom Change.

No direction reported GRADE Moderate
Samplen = 32 Pat.
DesignRCT
Summary

Pilot RCT on cannabidiol (CBD) in anorexia nervosa (n=32, CBD n=16 vs. placebo n=16), 21 days of treatment with up-titration to 6,25 mg/kg 2×/day. CBD well tolerated with expected pharmacokinetics and limited, non-serious side effects. Significant group×time interaction for BMI increase in favor of CBD (F=3,039, p<0,05, partial η²=0,252). Large effect sizes (partial η²>0,14) for improvements in body image concerns and loss of control over eating in favor of CBD, but not significant. Study limited by small sample size and short duration.

Confidence in the evidence
Moderate

The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.

Downgraded for
Imprecision
Quality profile
Sample size
Blinding
Effect size
Citations / year
Authors
Sahota N, Grelotti DJ, Nguyen T, Kaye WH, Swindle S, Suhandynata R, Seely S, Shott ME, Frank GKW
DOI 10.1002/eat.70034
Design: RCT
Share
Abstract
Objective: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a severe psychiatric disorder marked by an intense fear of gaining weight and persistent body dissatisfaction, both during periods of underweight and after weight restoration. The endocannabinoid system may offer therapeutic benefits, particularly in reducing anxiety. This randomized controlled trial of cannabidiol (CBD) investigated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and symptomatic improvement in An. Method: In a double-blind design, women with AN or Atypical AN were randomized to receive CBD (n = 16) or placebo (n = 16) over 21 days. The dose was up-titrated weekly from 1.25 mg/kg twice daily to a maximum of 6.25 mg/kg twice daily, while assessing CBD and metabolite levels, liver function, and severity of eating disorder, depression, and anxiety symptoms. Results: Age at baseline was similar between the CBD and placebo group (22.9 +/- 2.8 years vs. 22.5 +/- 3.5 years), as was body mass index (BMI, kg/m (2) , 20.1 +/- 2.5 vs. 19.4 +/- 1.8). CBD demonstrated the expected pharmacokinetics with limited and nonserious adverse events. Repeated measures MANCOVA indicated a small but significant group-by-time interaction for BMI increase in favor of CBD (F = 3.039, p = 0.046, partial eta (2) = 0.252). Effect sizes for improvements in shape concern and perception of lack of control over eating were also large (partial eta (2) > 0.14), favoring CBD but nonsignificant. Discussion: This study suggests that CBD is well tolerated in individuals with AN. Furthermore, indication of better weight recovery and improvement of eating disorder specific symptoms in the CBD group suggest treatment effects of CBD in AN. The study was, however, constrained by its small sample size and limited duration and requires replication in a larger sample. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04878627.

The impediment to action advances action. — Marcus Aurelius