Study register · detailMeta-Analyse · Cancer · 2023
Cannabinoids for symptom management in children with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chhabra et al.·CancerImpact 3.9
MixedGRADEModerate6 citations
Samplek = 19 Studien n = 1.927 Pat.
Durationunclear
ControlPlacebo
EndpointSymptom control
Blindingn.a.
DesignMeta-Analyse
”Key finding
Cannabinoids were frequently used for symptom control (58% for nausea/vomiting), but showed more frequent side effects in controlled trials (drowsiness, dizziness, dry mouth, discontinuation) without serious adverse events.
Summary
Systematic review on cannabinoids in children with cancer; k=19 studies (n=1.927): 8 retrospective chart reviews, 7 RCTs, 2 open-label studies, 2 case reports. Main indication: chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting (11/19 studies, 58%). Controlled trials showed somnolence, dizziness, dry mouth, treatment discontinuation due to side effects more frequently under cannabinoids; no serious cannabis-associated adverse events reported. Evidence for symptom management exists, but there is a lack of rigorous evidence on dosing, safety and efficacy in children with cancer.
P
PopulationChildren with cancer, pooled n=1927
I
InterventionCannabinoids (various products, formulations and routes of administration) for symptom control
C
ControlPlacebo (in controlled trials)
O
OutcomeCannabinoids were frequently used for chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting; somnolence, dizziness, dry mouth and treatment-related discontinuations more common under cannabinoids; no serious cannabis-related adverse events reported
Confidence in the evidence
Very lowLowModerateHigh
Moderate
The third of four GRADE levels, the effect estimate is probably reliable.
Downgraded for
Risk of bias
Quality profile
Sample size★★★★★
Blinding—
Effect sizeMixed
Citations / year★★★★★
Authors
Chhabra M, Ben-Eltriki M, Paul A, Le ML, Herbert A, Oberoi S, Bradford N, Bowers A, Rassekh SR, Kelly LE
Background: Despite the widespread use of medical cannabis, little is known regarding the safety, efficacy, and dosing of cannabis products in children with cancer. The objective of this study was to systematically appraise the existing published literature for the use of cannabis products in children with cancer.
Methods: This systematic review, registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020187433), searched four databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. Abstracts and full texts were screened in duplicate. Data on types of cannabis products, doses, formulations, frequencies, routes of administration, indications, and clinical and demographic details as well as reported efficacy outcomes were extracted. Data on cannabinoid-related adverse events were also summarized.
Results: Out of 34,611 identified citations, 19 unique studies with a total of 1927 participants with cancer were included: eight retrospective chart reviews, seven randomized controlled trials, two open-label studies, and two case reports. The included studies reported the use of various cannabis products for the management of symptoms. Cannabinoids were commonly used for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (11 of 19 [58%]). In controlled studies, somnolence, dizziness, dry mouth, and withdrawal due to adverse events were more commonly associated with the use of cannabinoids. Across all included studies, no serious cannabis-related adverse events were reported.
Conclusions: Although there is evidence to support the use of cannabis for symptom management, in children with cancer, there is a lack of rigorous evidence to inform the dosing, safety, and efficacy of cannabinoids. Because of the increasing interest in using cannabis, there is an urgent need for more research on medical cannabis in children with cancer.